Secure.gov sites use HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you've safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive information just on official, safe and secure websites.

- About - The Attorney general of the United States

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report an Offense
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Rights FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Chief law officer
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as proprietors and realty companies in addition to other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance business whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to persons since of:
  
  race or color. religion. sex. nationwide origin. familial status, or. special needs.
  
  In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of public importance. Where force or risk of force is utilized to reject or interfere with reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might institute criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also provides treatments for handling individual problems of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have actually been victims of a prohibited housing practice, may submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of people based upon referrals from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  Among the main goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by giving incorrect info about availability of housing, either saying that nothing was available or steering homeseekers to specific areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such incorrect details or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases declaring this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to discover this kind of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually declared discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have also alleged that towns and other city government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority communities, because the potential homeowners were expected to be mainly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers circumstances of obvious discrimination versus members of a particular religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances created to restrict using private homes as a places of worship. The variety of cases filed given that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in contrast to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does include a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the same religion.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this area has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are bad, and with limited housing alternatives, often have little recourse but to tolerate the humiliation and deterioration of sexual harassment or risk having their families and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is intended at property managers who produce an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from tenants or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to get relief for renters who have been treated unjustly by a landlord due to the fact that of sex and also hinder other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with consequences. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage lending may likewise adversely affect females, particularly minority ladies. This type of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his/her ancestors originated. Census information suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus local governments that have attempted to reduce or restrict the number of Hispanic families that might live in their communities. We have taken legal action against lending institutions under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against lenders for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the country have experienced an increasing diversity of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have acted against personal proprietors who have victimized such individuals.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus households with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out denial of housing to families with children, the Act also prevents housing suppliers from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of kids. For instance, property managers may not find families with kids in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable restriction on the total variety of persons who may live in a residence, or restrict their access to recreational services offered to other tenants. In many instances, the amended Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing provider from refusing to lease or sell to households with children. However, some facilities may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which satisfies the standards set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published policies and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of special needs in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a special needs to imply those individuals with psychological or physical disabilities that considerably limit several major life activities. The term psychological or physical problems might include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, movement disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, chronic fatigue, discovering disability, head injury, and psychological illness. The term major life activity might include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, caring for one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise safeguards individuals who have a record of such a disability, or are related to as having such an impairment. Current users of illegal illegal drugs, persons founded guilty for prohibited manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex offenders, and juvenile wrongdoers are not thought about disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no protections to people with or without specials needs who provide a direct hazard to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody poses such a direct danger needs to be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for persons with impairments has focused on two major areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other guidelines concerning land use are not used to prevent the residential choices of these individuals, including needlessly limiting communal, or gather together, property arrangements, such as group homes. The second location is insuring that recently constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with impairments, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that prohibit discrimination against people with specials needs, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with specials needs might cohabit in congregate living arrangements, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other city government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land usage policies that omit or otherwise discriminate versus individuals with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
  
  - To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance forbiding housing for individuals with impairments or a particular type of impairment, such as psychological illness, from locating in a specific area, while allowing other groups of unrelated individuals to live together in that location.
• To take action versus, or deny a permit, for a home since of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building license for a home because it was planned to provide housing for persons with psychological retardation.
• To decline to make affordable lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations may be essential to pay for persons or groups of individuals with specials needs a level playing field to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested modifications of guidelines or policies are reasonable. If an asked for adjustment imposes an excessive financial or administrative problem on a regional federal government, or if a modification creates an essential modification in a local government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  tiger.ch
  The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against individuals with disabilities to include a failure "to develop and construct" specific brand-new multi-family residences so that they are accessible to and usable by persons with impairments, and particularly people who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all freshly constructed multi-family dwellings of 4 or more systems planned for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular functions: an accessible entrance on an available path, accessible typical and public use locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible area, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a can steer about the space.
  
  Developers, home builders, owners, and designers accountable for the design or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings stop working to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been fixed by approval decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where possible and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building requirements) that will offer making other housing units accessible